Visita hindú
- Tema iniciado JQ01
- Fecha de inicio
lobo estepario
Forista Sancionado o Expulsado
Hinduismo; religiòn original de la India aunque no es la ùnica, ejemplo; budistas. Indìa, gentilicio, Indios.
!!yo llego a decir eso y me salta la jauria encima¡¡ con vos no se animanGuitro01 dijo:jajajaja sos un turro Marcos!!! estuvo muy buena esa!!!
.Es una cosa hermosa el Su 30MKI.
lobo estepario dijo:
hindú.
(Del fr. hindou).
1. adj. Natural de la India. U. t. c. s.
2. adj. Perteneciente o relativo a este país de Asia.
3. adj. Perteneciente o relativo al hinduismo.
4. adj. Partidario del hinduismo o adepto a él.
indio, dia.
1. adj. Natural de la India. U. t. c. s.
2. adj. Perteneciente o relativo a este país de Asia.
3. adj. Se dice del indígena de América, o sea de las Indias Occidentales, al que hoy se considera como descendiente de aquel sin mezcla de otra raza. U. t. c. s.
4. adj. Perteneciente o relativo a estos indios. Traje indio. Lengua india.
5. adj. despect. Guat. y Nic. inculto (‖ de modales rústicos).
6. m. Cuba. Sol. EL indio.
Aunque ambos son válidos, hindú es un término bastante más específico y no da lugar a error
.
Guitro01
Forista Sancionado o Expulsado
jedi-knigth dijo:!!yo llego a decir eso y me salta la jauria encima¡¡ con vos no se animan
Es una cosa hermosa el Su 30MKI.
Porque jedi?? lo dije con toda la buena onda del mundo y despues Marquitos aclaro, que no es que el F-16 sea un mal avion, todo lo contrario sino que los comprados por polonia, parecen estar "endemoniaaos" jejeje
Saludos
!!!porque en una discucion sobre estos temas yo tengo muuchos menos argumentos que marcos entonces se aprovechan de mi nobleza¡¡¡Guitro01 dijo:
Que bestialidad el freno aerodinamico. Con razon sumaron tantos litros al sacarlo en el Su35.
Hoot dijo:
Bien decís Hoot, parecidos son.
Saludos.
Julian5000
Colaborador
¿Hay noticias del desarrollo del ejercicio??
Teseo
Colaborador
Much was at stake of its reputation, when for the first-time-ever, the Royal Air Force's (RAF) Eurofighter Typhoon, developed by a consortium of European manufacturers and recently inducted into the RAF, was to engage in any kind of an aerial combat with any non-RAF/NATO fighter. The Indian Air Force's (IAF) Sukhoi-30 MKI 'air superiority fighter', which are at Waddington, UK for the bilateral air 'Exercise Indradhanush-2007', had an opponent for the befitting duel.
The operational part of the 'Exercise Indradhanush-2007' began with a series of 1 vs 1 air combat sorties. Both variants landed with their much-touted reputations intact as each side tested their potentials with their adversary in the air to their limits. These sorties were premised not entirely on having winners or losers – but more for their evaluator and training values as encapsulated in the objectives. Both sides ended-up sharing an enhanced respect for each other's capabilities – both in terms of training values, and combat potentials of the diverse aerial platforms.
While the RAF fielded some of their most-experienced and highly-qualified pilots, some of them being very senior performance evaluators in active service, the IAF pilots were a mix of 'young to middle-level pilots' from the 'Rhinos' squadron. The RAF pilots were candid in their admission of the Su-30 MKI's observed superior manouevring in the air, just as they had studied, prepared and anticipated. The IAF pilots on their part were also visibly impressed by the Typhoon's agility in the air.
While it does not imply to say that the 1 vs 1 air combat sorties were meant for backslapping each other, it may be understood that in today's aerial combat scenarios of 'beyond visual range' (BVR) capabilities of air platforms, it is highly unlikely that any of the modern-day fighters will ever get into a situation that warrants extreme close air combat, as in the situation simulated in the 1 vs 1 sorties. With a 'kill' criterion of front-gun ranges being mostly under 1000 metres and a visual tracking envelope behind the target for only up to a 60-degree cone mostly for most fighter aircraft of the world, the unlikely scenario gets more exemplified.
But the irony also lies in the fact that while there is a number of counter and counter-counter measures to make the modern missiles with claims of inescapable parameters redundant by using 'chaff' and other active/passive measures, a 'gun kill' is invariably a most certain kill. The pilots invariably begin honing their tracking and combat skills under such close combat situations.
The exercise that nearly runs into midway by the weekend constitutes mostly mixed missions where RAF F3 Tornados, Hawks and Typhoons are packed together with IAF Su-30 MKIs. The sorties include combat situations of 2 vs 1, 2 vs 2 and upward combinations. The raiders are tasked 'High Value Asset' (HVA) busting on the ground and 'High Value Airborne Asset' (HVAA) busting in the air with the defensive elements designated to counter their ambitions.
The operational part of the 'Exercise Indradhanush-2007' began with a series of 1 vs 1 air combat sorties. Both variants landed with their much-touted reputations intact as each side tested their potentials with their adversary in the air to their limits. These sorties were premised not entirely on having winners or losers – but more for their evaluator and training values as encapsulated in the objectives. Both sides ended-up sharing an enhanced respect for each other's capabilities – both in terms of training values, and combat potentials of the diverse aerial platforms.
While the RAF fielded some of their most-experienced and highly-qualified pilots, some of them being very senior performance evaluators in active service, the IAF pilots were a mix of 'young to middle-level pilots' from the 'Rhinos' squadron. The RAF pilots were candid in their admission of the Su-30 MKI's observed superior manouevring in the air, just as they had studied, prepared and anticipated. The IAF pilots on their part were also visibly impressed by the Typhoon's agility in the air.
While it does not imply to say that the 1 vs 1 air combat sorties were meant for backslapping each other, it may be understood that in today's aerial combat scenarios of 'beyond visual range' (BVR) capabilities of air platforms, it is highly unlikely that any of the modern-day fighters will ever get into a situation that warrants extreme close air combat, as in the situation simulated in the 1 vs 1 sorties. With a 'kill' criterion of front-gun ranges being mostly under 1000 metres and a visual tracking envelope behind the target for only up to a 60-degree cone mostly for most fighter aircraft of the world, the unlikely scenario gets more exemplified.
But the irony also lies in the fact that while there is a number of counter and counter-counter measures to make the modern missiles with claims of inescapable parameters redundant by using 'chaff' and other active/passive measures, a 'gun kill' is invariably a most certain kill. The pilots invariably begin honing their tracking and combat skills under such close combat situations.
The exercise that nearly runs into midway by the weekend constitutes mostly mixed missions where RAF F3 Tornados, Hawks and Typhoons are packed together with IAF Su-30 MKIs. The sorties include combat situations of 2 vs 1, 2 vs 2 and upward combinations. The raiders are tasked 'High Value Asset' (HVA) busting on the ground and 'High Value Airborne Asset' (HVAA) busting in the air with the defensive elements designated to counter their ambitions.
Si los typhoon hubieran despedazado a los Sukhoi lo estarian gritando al cielo y a todos los medios!
Estas declaraciones me suenan a que se comieron una buena cag*da o al menos no demostraron en absoluto la superioridad de su avioncito nuevo, y eso que volaban los mejores pilotos de la RAF contra jovenes y pilotos de no muy larga carrera Indios.
Al fin se demuestra lo que dicen los rusos en sus publicidades de Su-35 (superior al Su-30 Indu)... se van a comer a los Eurofighters!!!
Estas declaraciones me suenan a que se comieron una buena cag*da o al menos no demostraron en absoluto la superioridad de su avioncito nuevo, y eso que volaban los mejores pilotos de la RAF contra jovenes y pilotos de no muy larga carrera Indios.
Al fin se demuestra lo que dicen los rusos en sus publicidades de Su-35 (superior al Su-30 Indu)... se van a comer a los Eurofighters!!!
no dice mucho el articulo
todos dicen cosas lindas del otro
era de esperar q no den mucha data igual
Fotos
Su's:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233137/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233136/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233056/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233055/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233054/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233052/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1232862/L/
Gajaraj:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233049/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1232808/L/
Il-76 MKI
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1232994/L/
todos dicen cosas lindas del otro
era de esperar q no den mucha data igual
Fotos
Su's:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233137/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233136/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233056/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233055/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233054/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233052/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1232862/L/
Gajaraj:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1233049/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1232808/L/
Il-76 MKI
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1232994/L/
Fighting_Hawk dijo:
No lo creo al contrario. Los Ingleses pusieron a su personal mas experimentado para obtener datos sobre el comportamiento del SU los indios pusieron gente relativamente joven para que ganen experiencia. De todas formas esta hablando simulacion de combates AA solo con cañon en donde es sabido que el SU 30 es superior a casi cualquier cosa que le puedan poner en frente.
Temas similares
- Redacción
- Noticias del Sitio Web
- Redacción
- Noticias del Sitio Web
- Redacción
- Noticias del Sitio Web
- Redacción
- Noticias del Sitio Web