Responder al tema

Mensaje: <blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 1106438" data-attributes="member: 10929">Bueno, si decís que el gobierno de Iran no es democracia, averigua un poco de que trata esto "SS 1867 NDAA Martial Law" te dejo una pequeña sección, si queres completa en la red esta de la A a la Z. Indefinite detention without trial: Section 1021 Pursuant to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AUMF" target="_blank">AUMF</a>passed in the immediate aftermath of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks" target="_blank">September 11, 2001 attacks</a>, the NDAA text affirms the President's authority to detain, via the<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Armed_Forces" target="_blank">Armed Forces</a>, any person "who was part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners," and anyone who commits a "belligerent act" against the U.S. or its coalition allies, under the law of war, "without trial, until the end of the hostilities authorized by the [AUMF]." The text also authorizes trial by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_tribunal" target="_blank">military tribunal</a>, or "transfer to the custody or control of the person's country of origin," or transfer to "any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity."<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2012#cite_note-18" target="_blank">[19]</a> An amendment to the Act that would have explicitly forbidden the indefinite detention without trial of American citizens was rejected by the Senate.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2012#cite_note-19" target="_blank">[20]</a> Addressing previous conflict with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama_Administration" target="_blank">Obama Administration</a> regarding the wording of the Senate text, the Senate-House compromise text, in sub-section 1021(d), also affirms that nothing in the Act "is intended to limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force." The final version of the bill also provides, in sub-section(e), that "Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States." As reflected in Senate debate over the bill, there is a great deal of controversy over the status of existing law Uno de los principales pilares de la democracia</blockquote>

Verificación: Libertador de Argentina