Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="Grulla" data-source="post: 2412503" data-attributes="member: 5064"><a href="https://www.facebook.com/erik.simonsen83?fref=gs&amp;dti=34366349783&amp;hc_location=group_dialog" target="_blank">Erik Simonsen</a>‎ What Might Have Been: A hypothetical view of an operational USAF/Lockheed F-90A without tip tanks on a test flight. The Lockheed XF-90 competed against the McDonnell XF-88 and NAA YF-93A in the late-1940s, early 1950s &quot;Penetration Fighter&quot; contract. All the competitors suffered from inadequate engine performance. The &quot;Penetration Fighter&quot; requirement was subsequently cancelled, but later emerged with the more advanced McDonnell F-101A Voodoo. Details are covered in Chapter 3 of the book, &quot;U.S. Combat Aircraft Fly-Off Competitions&quot;, by Erik Simonsen. In all, the book features Ten Chapters of historic fighter/bomber competitions. Erik Simonsen photo/illustration <img src="https://scontent.faep7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/30740962_10209818059883237_5505349304044224512_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&amp;oh=85284515e6f02322e34566f768c103e6&amp;oe=5B7D72C1" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />What Might Have Been: Although the Republic XF-103 only reached the mockup stage during the early 1950s, here are two conceptual operational USAF/Republic F-103As from the 94th FIS. The F-103 would have had a dual-cycle turbo-ramjet engine capable of Mach 4 at 75,000 ft. – the initial takeoff and cruise to intercept would be handled by an air-breathing Wright turbojet – for the high-speed approach to final intercept the ramjet would kick in – for the return to base the turbojet would be restarted. Very unique, but the Air Force thought the technology was not ready. Erik Simonsen photo/illlustration<img src="https://scontent.faep7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/30742928_10209812790471505_4703257972468350976_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&amp;oh=f3c769cb9f4c1c7bb8b3ce7b632efeaa&amp;oe=5B7BEEF2" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Grulla, post: 2412503, member: 5064"] [URL='https://www.facebook.com/erik.simonsen83?fref=gs&dti=34366349783&hc_location=group_dialog']Erik Simonsen[/URL]‎ What Might Have Been: A hypothetical view of an operational USAF/Lockheed F-90A without tip tanks on a test flight. The Lockheed XF-90 competed against the McDonnell XF-88 and NAA YF-93A in the late-1940s, early 1950s "Penetration Fighter" contract. All the competitors suffered from inadequate engine performance. The "Penetration Fighter" requirement was subsequently cancelled, but later emerged with the more advanced McDonnell F-101A Voodoo. Details are covered in Chapter 3 of the book, "U.S. Combat Aircraft Fly-Off Competitions", by Erik Simonsen. In all, the book features Ten Chapters of historic fighter/bomber competitions. Erik Simonsen photo/illustration [IMG]https://scontent.faep7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/30740962_10209818059883237_5505349304044224512_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=85284515e6f02322e34566f768c103e6&oe=5B7D72C1[/IMG] What Might Have Been: Although the Republic XF-103 only reached the mockup stage during the early 1950s, here are two conceptual operational USAF/Republic F-103As from the 94th FIS. The F-103 would have had a dual-cycle turbo-ramjet engine capable of Mach 4 at 75,000 ft. – the initial takeoff and cruise to intercept would be handled by an air-breathing Wright turbojet – for the high-speed approach to final intercept the ramjet would kick in – for the return to base the turbojet would be restarted. Very unique, but the Air Force thought the technology was not ready. Erik Simonsen photo/illlustration [IMG]https://scontent.faep7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/30742928_10209812790471505_4703257972468350976_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=f3c769cb9f4c1c7bb8b3ce7b632efeaa&oe=5B7BEEF2[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verificación

Guerra desarrollada entre Argentina y el Reino Unido en 1982