Aviso de importancia, Reglamento del Foro actualizado. Reglas Técnicas, punto Q. Ir al siguiente link: Ver aviso

Responder al tema

Mensaje: <blockquote data-quote="DSV" data-source="post: 1497746" data-attributes="member: 10911">Esto mencionan en un foro:Canada's involvement was impossible politically, especially with Trudeau as PM. That said, as a Brit-born Canuck, I think the four Iroquois class destroyers with their SPS-501-guided RIM-7 Sea Sparrow SAMs mounted in rapid-fire quad-launchers, 5" gun and twin Sea Kings, would have made a good contribution. The rest of the escort fleet was without any SAM armament, so best to leave them at home, or more likely, as offerings to take the place of RN units in other theatres, thus releasing more RN units for the Malvinas campaign. Now, the Oberon class submarines HMCS Onondaga and HMCS Okanagan would have been useful, especially in close support to Ascension Island traffic. HMCS Provider, Protecteur and Preserver would have been very valuable as fleet replenishment ships.<a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/144404/t/Re-1982-WI-the-RNZN-had-helped-out-in-the-Malvinas-War.html#.UuFVCdItpnI" target="_blank">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/144404/t/Re-1982-WI-the-RNZN-had-helped-out-in-the-Malvinas-War.html#.UuFVCdItpnI</a></blockquote>